In Bourdieu’s essay, “On Television”, he brings to light many
underlying elements that construct ideology through presentation through the
media. In past readings, we have become familiarized with this type of filter, and
understand how the media influences the general public, through satire and
propaganda. One area that stood out to me was when Bourdieu stated, “Competitors
within a given field often have polemical images of one another. They produce
stereotypes about one another and insults as well” (255). In lieu of the current
election, I have chosen this point of the reading, because of the mass amounts
of satirical images between the republicans and democrats. These two competing
political parties have countless parodies of one another, supporting Bourdieu’s
theory that creating these insulting stereotypes is a strategy to “transform
the position the individual occupies in the field” (256).
All day, I could not go on Facebook
without seeing satirical representations of the opposite candidates or
political party. Bourdieu claims “these images themselves take a stand, which
essentially gives expression to the position occupied by the individual who,
with grater or lesser disclaimers, articulates the view in question” (256). The
stereotypes and perceptions that the two competing parties have for one another
are highlighted in these images to belittle the opposite threatening power. When
stereotypes, or insulting satires are used to attack each opponent, the
strategy takes a turn, neutralizing the competition. Stereotypes and parody,
used in the political campaign, coincides with Bourdieu’s example of the
competition between print journalists and television. These two examples correlate
with one another because each uses these strategies in hopes to discredit their
opponent.
The Image I have attached below, exemplifies how one competitor can produce a satirical image, to attack its
opponent.
No comments:
Post a Comment