This reading I found to be very confusing to
read and interpret what Macherey was really trying to say. The vocabulary and
the ideas he was presenting seemed very advanced. Even though it was a short
reading it still took a very long time to understand. The quote, “In the book,
then, everything is said, and for everything to be said we must await the
critical ‘explicit’, which may actually be interminable.” For me Macherey is
trying to say that when reading literature the words and ideas of any reading
are really left up to the reader to interpret. This is because how you read
anything and your thoughts on what is being read really does change your
viewing on the subject matter. “Whence the problem: are there books which say
what they mean, without being critical books, that is to say without depending
directly on other books?” This I take this, as meaning that there really isn’t
a way for text to be fully stated and not be left for any interpretation. I
think that there are so many ways to read something and that is what Macherey
is saying. Unlike hearing, when you read you don’t have a tone to hear to grasp
the idea of the text more. But also just people having so many opinions and
views on subjects shapes their thoughts of what they read. I think that this
article can really just be described by showing pictures of books. The whole
concept of this chapter was to learn about text and how it can be viewed and
interpreted. This concept though has been going on forever though. People have
always been thinking critically and that will never change. We leave our
interpretations up to our brain and how it critically analyzes the information.
I also think this applies to not only serious text but also fiction books also.
No comments:
Post a Comment